top of page

Is it inner hearing or not?

  • Writer: davidsmith208
    davidsmith208
  • May 20
  • 2 min read

Yes — that is a very plausible mystical reading of Book of Proverbs 20:12, especially when interpreted through contemplative traditions.

The verse reads roughly:

“The hearing ear and the seeing eye —


the Lord has made them both.”

Hebrew:

  • אֹזֶן שֹׁמַעַת (ozen shoma‘at) = “hearing ear”

  • וְעַיִן רֹאָה (ve-ayin ro’ah) = “seeing eye”

Notice:


the Hebrew is slightly intensified:

  • not merely “ear” but “hearing ear”

  • not merely “eye” but “seeing eye”

This invites symbolic interpretation.


Literal level

At the plain wisdom-literature level, the verse means:

  • God created human faculties of perception.

  • Therefore humans should perceive wisely.

  • Hearing truth and seeing reality are divine gifts.

This fits Proverbs’ general themes:

  • discernment,

  • attention,

  • wisdom,

  • moral perception.


But the Hebrew allows deeper readings

Biblical Hebrew often uses sensory language metaphorically:

Sense faculty

Spiritual meaning

hearing

obedience, receptivity

seeing

understanding, revelation

blindness

spiritual ignorance

deafness

refusal of truth

So already inside the Hebrew Bible:

  • hearing and seeing are more than physical acts.


Inner hearing in biblical tradition

There is a long trajectory toward:

  • inward hearing,

  • spiritual audition,

  • revelation.

Examples:

“Hear, O Israel…”


(Hebrew Shema)

This means more than sound reception.


It means:

  • inward attentiveness,

  • receptivity to divine truth.

Prophets “hear” the word of God inwardly.


Inner sight in biblical tradition

Likewise:

  • prophets “see” visions,

  • wisdom literature speaks of enlightened eyes,

  • apocalyptic texts describe visionary seeing.

Examples:

  • Ezekiel

  • Daniel

  • Zechariah

The “seer” in ancient Israel was literally:

  • ro’eh = one who sees.


Mystical traditions took this farther

Jewish mysticism, Christian mysticism, Sufism, and Sant traditions often interpreted these senses inwardly.

Thus:

  • outer hearing ↔ inner hearing

  • outer sight ↔ inner sight


Comparison to Sant Mat and Sufi concepts

Your intuition parallels:

  • Shabd / inner sound current

  • inner light

  • spiritual audition

  • visionary perception

In many contemplative systems:

Outer faculty

Inner faculty

eye

spiritual vision

ear

spiritual hearing

Thus mystical interpreters might read Proverbs 20:12 as implying:

God created not only physical perception but capacities for spiritual perception.


Hebrew nuances

The participles are interesting:

  • shoma‘at = actively hearing/listening

  • ro’ah = actively seeing/perceiving

These are dynamic faculties.

Not passive organs —


living awareness.


Ancient Near Eastern background

In the biblical world:

  • true perception was moral and spiritual,


    not merely sensory.

A person could:

  • physically see yet be blind,

  • physically hear yet not hear.

This becomes a central prophetic criticism.

For example:

“Having eyes, they do not see; having ears, they do not hear.”

So Proverbs may already hint:

genuine perception is a divine gift.


Christian mystical interpretation

Later Christian contemplatives interpreted such verses inwardly:

  • “eyes of the heart”

  • “inner ear”

  • “spiritual senses”

Especially:

  • Origen

  • Augustine of Hippo

  • medieval mystics

  • Hesychasts

They taught:

  • inner illumination,

  • hearing the divine Logos,

  • contemplative perception.


Sufi parallels

Sufis similarly speak of:

  • the “ear of the heart”

  • “seeing with the eye of the heart”

Arabic:

  • basira = inner sight

The Quran repeatedly contrasts:

  • outward blindness


    with

  • blindness of the heart.


So your interpretation is quite defensible

Not necessarily as the sole original meaning —


Proverbs is still wisdom literature —


but as a contemplative reading rooted in longstanding symbolic traditions.

In mystical interpretation the verse can imply:

God gave humanity capacities for both outer and inner perception.

And many contemplative traditions would say:

  • meditation,

  • prayer,

  • silence,

  • purification,

  • receptivity,

awaken the deeper forms of hearing and seeing.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Less Need

There is less need for coloration and decoration - you just go to the place and expunge the ego. The place in the morning is where the bird sings. Total detachment leads to less gravity. When you l

 
 
 
Davis Besse

That looks like a very varied and balanced day rather than one long, repetitive workout. You combined: 2-mile walk with your wife at 6 a.m. — social and emotional connection plus light aerobic exercis

 
 
 
Active recovery

That pattern is interesting because it matches what exercise physiology would predict. You had: Friday: tennis + pickleball accumulation Saturday morning: 3 tennis sets Then beach volleyball Then outd

 
 
 

Comments


© 2023 by Nick Martinez. Proudly created with Wix.com

© Copyright
bottom of page