Is it inner hearing or not?
- davidsmith208
- May 20
- 2 min read
Yes — that is a very plausible mystical reading of Book of Proverbs 20:12, especially when interpreted through contemplative traditions.
The verse reads roughly:
“The hearing ear and the seeing eye —
the Lord has made them both.”
Hebrew:
אֹזֶן שֹׁמַעַת (ozen shoma‘at) = “hearing ear”
וְעַיִן רֹאָה (ve-ayin ro’ah) = “seeing eye”
Notice:
the Hebrew is slightly intensified:
not merely “ear” but “hearing ear”
not merely “eye” but “seeing eye”
This invites symbolic interpretation.
Literal level
At the plain wisdom-literature level, the verse means:
God created human faculties of perception.
Therefore humans should perceive wisely.
Hearing truth and seeing reality are divine gifts.
This fits Proverbs’ general themes:
discernment,
attention,
wisdom,
moral perception.
But the Hebrew allows deeper readings
Biblical Hebrew often uses sensory language metaphorically:
Sense faculty
Spiritual meaning
hearing
obedience, receptivity
seeing
understanding, revelation
blindness
spiritual ignorance
deafness
refusal of truth
So already inside the Hebrew Bible:
hearing and seeing are more than physical acts.
Inner hearing in biblical tradition
There is a long trajectory toward:
inward hearing,
spiritual audition,
revelation.
Examples:
“Hear, O Israel…”
(Hebrew Shema)
This means more than sound reception.
It means:
inward attentiveness,
receptivity to divine truth.
Prophets “hear” the word of God inwardly.
Inner sight in biblical tradition
Likewise:
prophets “see” visions,
wisdom literature speaks of enlightened eyes,
apocalyptic texts describe visionary seeing.
Examples:
Ezekiel
Daniel
Zechariah
The “seer” in ancient Israel was literally:
ro’eh = one who sees.
Mystical traditions took this farther
Jewish mysticism, Christian mysticism, Sufism, and Sant traditions often interpreted these senses inwardly.
Thus:
outer hearing ↔ inner hearing
outer sight ↔ inner sight
Comparison to Sant Mat and Sufi concepts
Your intuition parallels:
Shabd / inner sound current
inner light
spiritual audition
visionary perception
In many contemplative systems:
Outer faculty
Inner faculty
eye
spiritual vision
ear
spiritual hearing
Thus mystical interpreters might read Proverbs 20:12 as implying:
God created not only physical perception but capacities for spiritual perception.
Hebrew nuances
The participles are interesting:
shoma‘at = actively hearing/listening
ro’ah = actively seeing/perceiving
These are dynamic faculties.
Not passive organs —
living awareness.
Ancient Near Eastern background
In the biblical world:
true perception was moral and spiritual,
not merely sensory.
A person could:
physically see yet be blind,
physically hear yet not hear.
This becomes a central prophetic criticism.
For example:
“Having eyes, they do not see; having ears, they do not hear.”
So Proverbs may already hint:
genuine perception is a divine gift.
Christian mystical interpretation
Later Christian contemplatives interpreted such verses inwardly:
“eyes of the heart”
“inner ear”
“spiritual senses”
Especially:
Origen
Augustine of Hippo
medieval mystics
Hesychasts
They taught:
inner illumination,
hearing the divine Logos,
contemplative perception.
Sufi parallels
Sufis similarly speak of:
the “ear of the heart”
“seeing with the eye of the heart”
Arabic:
basira = inner sight
The Quran repeatedly contrasts:
outward blindness
with
blindness of the heart.
So your interpretation is quite defensible
Not necessarily as the sole original meaning —
Proverbs is still wisdom literature —
but as a contemplative reading rooted in longstanding symbolic traditions.
In mystical interpretation the verse can imply:
God gave humanity capacities for both outer and inner perception.
And many contemplative traditions would say:
meditation,
prayer,
silence,
purification,
receptivity,
awaken the deeper forms of hearing and seeing.

Comments