The HYP up the center
Yes. The passage you photographed is a very good place to begin, because the Haṭha Yoga Pradīpikā (HYP) is not really saying, in modern physiological terms, “make the air travel through a tube in the spine.” It is describing a yogic model of how breath, vital energy, attention, and consciousness are connected.
What is the HYP?
The Haṭha Yoga Pradīpikā, traditionally attributed to Svātmārāma, is one of the major classical manuals of Haṭha Yoga, probably composed around the 15th century. Pradīpikā means something like “lamp,” “light,” or “that which illuminates.” It presents Haṭha Yoga as a practical method for transforming the body-breath-mind system so that deeper meditation becomes possible.
Its four chapters deal broadly with:
Āsana — bodily postures and physical preparation
Prāṇāyāma — breath/prāṇa regulation and purification of the nāḍīs
Mudrā and bandha — methods for directing and containing prāṇa
Samādhi — absorption and the stilling of mind
So the passage you’ve photographed is right at the heart of the HYP’s theory.
The crucial idea: prāṇa and mind move together
Your first passage says:
When the breath wanders, the mind becomes unstable. When the breath is still, the mind is steady.
The Sanskrit distinction is important.
Prāṇa is not simply “oxygen” or “breath.”
It is prāṇa, from the verbal root √an, “to breathe, live,” with pra- giving a sense of forth, before, intensely, etc.
So prāṇa is simultaneously:
breath,
vitality,
life-force,
the animating movement of the organism,
and, in the yogic model, something subtler than ordinary respiration.
That’s why translating prāṇa simply as “breath” can obscure what the HYP is doing.
The HYP is proposing a remarkable practical relationship:
breath → prāṇa → movement of mind
and therefore:
regulate the breath → regulate prāṇa → steady the mind.
That last step is the really important one for a modern practitioner.
Then what is suṣumṇā?
The HYP describes three principal nāḍīs:
iḍā — suṣumṇā — piṅgalā
Very roughly:
iḍā — associated traditionally with the left side
piṅgalā — associated with the right side
suṣumṇā — the central channel
The word suṣumṇā is interesting. It is an ancient Sanskrit term whose history predates Haṭha Yoga, and its later yogic use becomes the name of the central subtle channel.
You should resist translating it into a literal anatomical structure.
It isn’t something that has been demonstrated to be a physical tube running inside the spinal cord.
Instead, think of the three nāḍīs as part of a traditional phenomenological map of consciousness and breath.
And this makes verse 4 much more understandable
Your photograph gives:
malākulāsu nāḍīṣu māruto naiva madhyagaḥ
Literally, roughly:
“The wind does not move in the middle [central channel] because the nāḍīs are filled/obstructed with impurities.”
Then:
kathaṃ svād unmanībhāvaḥ kāryasiddhiḥ kathaṃ bhavet
Something like:
“How then could the state of unmanī arise? How could accomplishment/perfection of the practice occur?”
This is a very important word:
unmanī
Un-manī can be understood as “beyond mind” / “mindless” / “the state in which ordinary mental activity has ceased.”
The HYP’s chain is therefore approximately:
impure/blocked nāḍīs
↓
prāṇa doesn’t enter suṣumṇā
↓
mind continues to fluctuate
↓
unmanī cannot arise
whereas:
purified nāḍīs
↓
prāṇa enters suṣumṇā
↓
mind becomes extremely still
↓
unmanī / deeper absorption becomes possible.
That’s the architecture of the teaching.
But what does “prāṇa enters suṣumṇā” mean for us?
This is where I would make an important modern distinction.
You don’t have to believe that there is literally a column of invisible air traveling up the spinal cord.
Instead, you can treat suṣumṇā as a map for an experience of centralization.
Notice what happens when breathing becomes:
slow,
quiet,
effortless,
symmetrical,
and increasingly subtle.
Attention tends to become less scattered.
Instead of being pulled toward:
sound → thought → memory → planning → body sensation → thought → outside world
attention can become increasingly one-pointed and inward.
The HYP calls that movement of prāṇa into the central channel.
A modern description might be:
The breathing system becomes quiet enough that attention becomes quiet enough that consciousness can be experienced without its normal degree of mental turbulence.
Those aren’t necessarily two competing explanations. They’re two different vocabularies describing the practice.
How could you actually begin?
I would start much more simply than the advanced HYP practices.
1. Sit comfortably
You don’t need an elaborate lotus posture.
A stable chair or cushion is perfectly adequate.
The important thing is:
upright + relaxed + immobile enough that you don’t constantly have to adjust yourself.
2. First simply observe the breath
Don’t control it.
For 3–5 minutes notice:
inhale → exhale → pause → inhale → exhale
And particularly notice the difference between:
breathing and thinking about breathing.
That’s already a form of prāṇāyāma preparation.
3. Gradually make the exhalation quiet
Don’t take deeper breaths.
Instead, make ordinary breathing slightly slower and quieter.
For example:
inhale ~4 seconds
exhale ~5–6 seconds
But don’t treat those numbers as a target.
The HYP’s ideal is not “huge breaths.”
It is increasingly subtle breath.
Then try nāḍī śodhana
This is probably the most accessible practical doorway into the HYP’s nāḍī theory.
Nāḍī śodhana = “purification/cleansing of the nāḍīs.”
A gentle version:
Exhale normally.
Close the right nostril.
Inhale gently through the left.
Exhale through the right.
Inhale through the right.
Exhale through the left.
That’s one cycle.
Do perhaps 5 cycles, slowly and comfortably.
Importantly, don’t hold your breath initially.
The classical HYP eventually becomes much more demanding, involving ratios, retention (kumbhaka), bandhas and other techniques. You don’t need those to investigate the central idea.
Then comes the really interesting experiment
After several rounds of alternate-nostril breathing, stop manipulating the breath.
Sit quietly.
Let the breathing return to normal.
Then observe:
Where is my attention?
Instead of trying to visualize a glowing tube in the spine, simply notice the central axis of the body:
head
↓
throat
↓
chest
↓
abdomen
↓
pelvis
You can allow attention to rest along that vertical axis.
Don’t force anything upward.
Don’t try to “push prāṇa into suṣumṇā.”
That’s actually contrary to the spirit of the experiment.
Make the conditions quiet and see what happens.
This connects beautifully with nāda
This is particularly interesting given your interest in inner sound.
The HYP eventually gives enormous importance to nāda, the inner sound.
There is a progression that you can investigate experientially:
gross breath
↓
quiet breath
↓
quiet body
↓
quiet mind
↓
subtle internal sensations
↓
inner sound / nāda
↓
increasing absorption
You don’t have to decide beforehand whether an inner sound is “mystical” or merely physiological.
Simply notice it.
The traditional instruction is essentially:
Don’t chase the sound. Let attention become absorbed in it.
That is quite different from trying to manufacture an experience.
The deepest point of the photograph
I think verse 3 is actually the key to understanding the whole thing:
“As long as the vāyu remains in the body, it is called life. When it leaves the body, this is death.”
The HYP is working with an extremely old Indian intuition:
life is movement.
And mind is also movement.
The Sanskrit word vṛtti, which becomes so important in Patañjali, means something like a turning, movement, activity, modification.
Haṭha Yoga therefore attacks the problem from the other direction:
If I can’t simply order the mind to become still, perhaps I can work with the thing that moves together with the mind—the breath/prāṇa.
That is why Haṭha Yoga can be understood as a kind of engineering of stillness.
A very practical 15-minute experiment
Given your interest in quiet early-morning meditation, I would try this:
0–3 min: Sit and observe natural breathing.
3–8 min: Five to eight gentle rounds of alternate-nostril breathing. No retention.
8–10 min: Let the breath become completely natural.
10–15 min: Do nothing. Feel the body as one vertical axis. Let attention become increasingly subtle.
If an inner sound appears, listen rather than analyze.
If thoughts appear, don’t fight them.
If the breath becomes extremely quiet, don’t deliberately make it quieter.
That last point is important.
You’re not trying to “make suṣumṇā happen.”
You’re creating the conditions in which the traditional description—breath becomes subtle, mind becomes still, attention becomes centralized—can be explored directly.
And that gives you a very interesting bridge between the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, Patañjali’s stilling of the fluctuations of mind, and your interest in nāda/inner sound without requiring us to assume that the nāḍīs are literal anatomical tubes.

Comments