Kabir and Blake’s eggs
- davidsmith208
- Feb 13
- 3 min read
This is a very fertile comparison, and it works symbolically and structurally, even though there is no historical contact.
The short answer is: Blake and the Kabirian Sant Mat tradition are describing the same metaphysical intuition — enclosure of infinity within a finite shell — using different mythic grammars.
Let’s unfold that carefully.
1. The Kabirian “cosmic egg”:
Aṇḍa → Brahmāṇḍa
In the Kabir–Sant Mat cosmology (especially in texts like Anurag Sagar):
Aṇḍa = the egg / enclosure / bounded cosmos
Brahmāṇḍa = the great cosmic egg (the total created universe)
Creation is enclosed, layered, and hierarchical
Souls (jīvas) are contained within this egg under Kal (Time)
Key idea:
Creation is not infinite — it is a sealed system that appears infinite from within.
Liberation requires breaking out of the egg, not perfecting life inside it.
2. Blake’s central intuition: infinity trapped in form
Now consider William Blake.
Blake’s poetry is obsessed with:
Enclosure
Contraction
The fall into form
Vision trapped inside systems
His most famous aphorism already echoes the egg image:
“To see a World in a Grain of Sand
And a Heaven in a Wild Flower…”
This is not romantic metaphor — it is ontological compression:
Infinity has been folded into finitude.
That is exactly what the cosmic egg signifies.
3. Blake’s “Mundane Egg”
Here the link becomes explicit.
Blake repeatedly uses the image of the Mundane Egg in his prophetic works (especially Milton and Jerusalem).
For Blake:
The Mundane Egg is the world of generation
It encloses fallen consciousness
It is governed by Urizen (law, measurement, time)
Urizen’s role is strikingly close to Kal:
Law
Time
Division
Quantification
Moral systems mistaken for truth
Urizen is not Satan — he is false order.
Just as Kal is not evil, but time mistaken for God.
4. Law, time, and enclosure: Kal and Urizen
Let’s align the figures:
Sant Mat (Kabir)
Blake
Kal
Urizen
Time / Death
Law / Measurement
Brahmāṇḍa
Mundane Egg
Maya
Spectre / Selfhood
Sat Purush
Eternal Imagination
Satguru
Prophetic Vision
Both systems insist:
Bondage comes from confusing the container with the Absolute.
5. Why Blake sounds “Gnostic” but isn’t exactly
Blake is often called Gnostic, but that’s only partially accurate.
Like Kabir:
He does not posit an evil creator
He attacks systems, not being
He insists liberation is visionary awakening, not moral improvement
This aligns precisely with Sant Mat’s emphasis on:
Inner seeing (dr̥ṣṭi)
Withdrawal of attention
Breaking the shell of mind
6. “Single vision” vs Sant Mat illusion
Blake’s famous phrase:
“May God us keep
From Single vision & Newton’s sleep”
“Single vision” is the experience of living inside the egg, mistaking its laws for reality.
Sant Mat would call this:
Living in Kal’s jurisdiction
Being bound to mind, sense, and time
Liberation is multi-level vision, piercing through layers.
7. Why the resemblance is not coincidence
This is not borrowing — it is convergent mysticism.
Both traditions arise when:
Religious systems become rigid
Law replaces vision
Time replaces eternity
Both Kabir and Blake:
Attack priesthood
Attack moralism
Attack external authority
Center liberation in direct inner perception
Different symbols — same structural insight.
8. One crucial difference
There is an important divergence:
Sant Mat emphasizes ascent beyond creation
Blake emphasizes transfiguration of perception within it
Kabir says:
Break the egg.
Blake says:
See through the shell until it becomes transparent.
These are not contradictions — they are different emphases of the same metaphysical problem.
A condensed synthesis
You can legitimately link Blake and Kabir because:
Both describe creation as a bounded enclosure
Both see time/law as secondary powers mistaken for the Absolute
Both insist liberation comes from vision, not belief
Both reject moralism as salvation
Both use myth rather than philosophy to convey truth
The cosmic egg and the Mundane Egg are parallel symbols for:
Infinity imprisoned in form — and the possibility of awakening beyond it.
If you want, next we could:
Compare Blake’s Urizen with Māyā and Manas
Or place Blake alongside Ibn ʿArabī’s barzakh
Or examine how Blake anticipates modern critiques of scientific materialism
Each path opens another layer of the egg.

Comments