top of page

Teaching with parables

  • Writer: davidsmith208
    davidsmith208
  • Jan 18
  • 2 min read

You are pointing to a very precise claim Rumi is making about method, not just poetry. Let’s take him at his word and answer quantitatively and linguistically, as you asked.


“A parable, not an analogy,

To thaw the frozen mind effectively.” (Masnavi V.118)


Rumi is distinguishing parable (tamthīl / mathal) from abstract reasoning. He is also implicitly placing himself in a lineage of teachers who teach by narrative shock rather than doctrine.





1. Who, across religions, used parables most extensively?



When scholars actually count, one figure stands out overwhelmingly:



Jesus of Nazareth



Not symbolically, but numerically and structurally.





2. Quantitative comparison (approximate but scholarly standard)




Jesus (Synoptic Gospels + John)



Depending on definition (extended parables vs. brief parabolic sayings):


  • ~30–40 major parables

  • ~60–70 short parabolic sayings

  • Total parabolic units: ~90–100



Examples:


  • Sower

  • Prodigal Son

  • Good Samaritan

  • Lost Coin

  • Mustard Seed

  • Wicked Tenants

  • Net, Pearl, Treasure, Leaven, etc.



Jesus explicitly states why he uses parables:

“Seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear.” (Matthew 13)


That is exactly Rumi’s phrase “to thaw frozen minds.”





Rumi (Masnavi)



The Masnavi is structurally a book of parables.


Modern counts vary because stories nest within stories, but conservative scholarly tallies give:


  • ~400–450 distinct narrative parables

  • Thousands of micro-parables and exempla

  • Spread across 6 books, ~25,000 couplets



However:


  • Rumi is reflecting on parables

  • Jesus is teaching almost exclusively through them



So Rumi is the theorist and master-poet of parables; Jesus is the teacher whose public instruction is primarily parabolic.





Buddha (Pāli Canon)



  • ~100–150 parables/similes

  • Many are brief (rafts, arrows, blind men & elephant)

  • Often explanatory rather than disruptive






Prophet Muhammad



  • Parables (amthāl) exist, but are limited

  • Qur’an contains ~40–50 explicit parables

  • Hadith includes illustrative stories, but:


    • Legal and exhortative discourse dominates







Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)



  • Notable parable users:


    • Nathan (David & the ewe lamb)

    • Ezekiel


  • Total extended parables: <20






3. Linguistic convergence: Rumi and Jesus



Rumi’s Persian term corresponds to Arabic mathal and Hebrew mashal — the exact same semantic field used in the Bible.



Shared features:


Feature

Jesus

Rumi

Parable over logic

Yes

Yes

Shock / reversal

Yes

Yes

Moral ambiguity

Yes

Yes

Targets ego-intellect

Yes

Yes

Aimed at inner transformation

Yes

Yes

Jesus:


“The last shall be first.”


Rumi:


“The intellect has weak legs.”


Both are anti-ego pedagogies.





4. Why parables “thaw frozen minds” (Rumi’s psychology)



Rumi is very precise here:


  • Frozen mind = ego-bound intellect

  • Argument strengthens the ego

  • Parable bypasses resistance

  • Story enters imagination → heart → insight



Jesus says the same thing in different language:


“A seed falls… some on stone, some on soil.”


That is cognitive psychology, centuries before the term existed.





5. Final answer (direct and quantitative)



No religious teacher in recorded history used parables as consistently and centrally as Jesus.


  • Jesus: ~90–100 parables/sayings

  • Rumi: ~400–450 narrative parables (but as a literary mystic, not a public preacher)

  • Buddha: ~100–150

  • Qur’anic parables: ~40–50



Rumi is self-consciously placing himself in the same pedagogical lineage when he says:


“A parable, not an analogy.”


That line could stand unchanged in the Gospels.


If you want, next we can:


  • Compare Masnavi parables directly with specific Gospel parables, or

  • Analyze why Jesus never explains parables unless pressed, exactly like Rumi.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Tennis benefits

Great question — and very aligned with how you’ve been training. Intense tennis (especially competitive match play like your 14–16 game wins) activates a broad neurochemical cascade. It’s not just “en

 
 
 
Dink Think

David, this is a very smart instinct. If your goal is protect the arm + raise your level, then shifting from “tennis-style banging” to a soft-game, kitchen-dominant strategy is exactly what higher-lev

 
 
 
Sunday morning exercise

David, with your pattern lately — strong Friday racquet play (you’ve been winning a lot of games), then Saturday swim + sauna — Sunday morning should restore power and elasticity, not grind you down.

 
 
 

Comments


© 2023 by Nick Martinez. Proudly created with Wix.com

© Copyright
bottom of page