Tennis
- davidsmith208
- 2 hours ago
- 3 min read
1. What
actually
happens after intense exercise (like 3 sets of tennis)
Neurochemistry (the “after” effect)
After sustained, challenging exercise, several systems change for hours, not minutes:
Endorphins
Reduce pain perception
Create calm pleasure rather than hype
Persist post-exercise
Serotonin
Improves mood stability and emotional regulation
Linked to patience, reduced irritability, and social warmth
Exercise increases serotonin synthesis and receptor sensitivity
Dopamine
Reinforces motivation and reward learning
You feel more capable and less avoidant
BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor)
Improves cognitive flexibility and emotional resilience
This is crucial: you’re not just happier—you’re less reactive
Cortisol normalization
Even though cortisol rises during play, afterward it drops below baseline
This produces a sense of grounded calm
So yes: happiness increases, but more precisely:
You become more emotionally regulated, generous in attention, and less defensive.
That distinction matters.
2. Why this isn’t just “feeling good” — it changes behavior
After intense exercise, people reliably show:
Increased patience
Better impulse control
More prosocial behavior
Less rumination
More present-moment awareness
This means:
You interrupt people less
You listen better
You interpret others more generously
You respond instead of react
These are social virtues, not just private pleasures.
3. The ethical move: from personal benefit → benefit to others
Here’s how to build the argument cleanly.
Step 1: Emotional states affect interpersonal outcomes
This is uncontroversial:
A regulated person produces fewer conflicts
Mood is contagious (emotional resonance / affective contagion)
One calm person can stabilize a room
Step 2: Exercise reliably improves emotional regulation
This is biological, not moralizing.
You are:
Less anxious
Less irritable
More resilient to frustration
Step 3: Therefore, exercise changes how others experience you
Others experience:
More kindness
More space
Less tension
More safety
You are easier to be with.
Step 4: Therefore, exercise is not morally neutral
It becomes a relational good.
By regulating myself, I reduce the emotional tax I place on others.
That’s a strong ethical claim.
4. A clear argument you could actually say out loud
Here’s a concise version you could use in conversation:
“When I exercise hard, like playing several sets of tennis, it doesn’t just make me feel good. It stabilizes my nervous system for hours afterward. I’m calmer, more patient, and more attentive with people. That changes how others feel around me. In that sense, exercise isn’t just self-care—it’s a way of being less burdensome and more generous toward others.”
That’s persuasive because it avoids ego and avoids exaggeration.
5. Philosophical framing (if you want depth)
Aristotelian / virtue ethics
Exercise cultivates temperance, patience, and good judgment
A well-regulated body supports a well-regulated character
Buddhist framing
Reduces craving and aversion
Produces equanimity (upekkhā)
Less suffering transmitted to others
Modern ethics
Mental health is relational, not private
Actions that improve regulation improve the commons
6. Important caveat (to keep the argument honest)
The argument holds only if:
Exercise does not lead to ego inflation
You don’t use fitness as moral superiority
Recovery is respected (overtraining can reverse the effect)
In other words:
Exercise makes you happier when it makes you kinder, not harder.
7. Final distilled claim
Here’s the tightest formulation:
Intense exercise improves mood, emotional regulation, and stress tolerance. Those changes persist beyond the workout and directly shape how others experience us. Therefore, exercise is not only a private benefit but a social good: it reduces friction, increases generosity, and spreads emotional stability. In that sense, caring for one’s body becomes a form of caring for others.



Comments